In continuation of our series on site search box best practices, today we dive into the size of the search box. In our analysis of search boxes of the top 50 retailers on the IR 500 we looked at two components of size. The first was the overall space devoted to site search functionality. This included things like any text in front of the search box, drop downs menus to refine the search by department and the search submit button. The second space we measured was the size of the search input box. In both cases, we took the height X width to calculate the approx. total pixels.
Given the diversity in the search box placement we found in part 1 of our analysis, it should come as no surprise that we also found the size of the search box to vary wildly. The total pixels ranged from 29,820 at Barnes & Noble to 2,646 pixels at Gap. The average area for all 50 retailers came in at 10,859 and the retailer closest to this number was Kohl’s.
Largest Search Box Area – Barnes & Noble (29,820 pixels)
Smallest Search Box Area – Gap (2,646 pixels)
Average Search Box Area – Kohl’s (10,859 pixels)
To get a better idea of the distribution in search box sizes among the top 50 retailers, here is a graph of the total pixels. Aside from the sharp decline with the first seven sites, the distribution was fairly even.
Here are some examples from the retailers with the most amount of space dedicated to search.
Search Input Box Size
In our analysis of the input box size, we found a fairly wide distribution there as well. The largest input box was from Overstock.com and measured at 13,312 pixels while the smallest was Amway with just 1,632 pixels. The average of all 50 retailers came in at 5,969 and CDW was the closest to that with 6,312.
Largest Search Input Area – Overstock.com (13,312 pixels)
Smallest Search Input Area – Amway (1,632 pixels)
Average Search Input Area – CDW (6,312 pixels)
The distribution of search input box sizes among the top 50 retailers showed a fairly even spread from the highest to the lowest.
The biggest surprise for me with this analysis is just how far apart retailers are on the emphasis they give to the site search box. I suspect that this is also an indication that there has been very little testing done on how the site search box impacts the customer experience and revenue.
The good news is that the tools to test this sort of thing continue to improve and become more accessible to retailers. For SLI Systems customers, the capability to do A/B and Multivariate testing is already available. If you have conducted any tests on the size of your site search box please do share your findings in the comments below.
In Part 3 of this series, I will reveal what we learned about the default help text from our search box analysis.